초록 열기/닫기 버튼

연구목적: 본 연구는 지역주민을 대상으로 정신장애인에 대한 인권감수성의 수준과 관련요인을 파악하기 위하여 실시되었다. 연구방법: 연구대상자는 M시와 C군에 거주하는 30대에서 60대 성인 300명이었다. 자료수집은 2010년 11월 1달간 구조화된 자기기입형 설문지를 이용하였으며, 수집된 자료는 SPSS win 18.0을 이용하여 t 검정과 분산분석을 실시하였다. 연구결과: 전반적인 인권감수성은 60점 만점에 16.2점, 상황지각은 20점 만점에 5.2점, 결과지각은 5.4점, 책임지각은 5.6점이었다. 인권별로 ‘관리 받을 권리’가 15점 만점에 5.7점으로 가장 높았고, ‘신체의 자유권’이 2.8점으로 가장 낮았다. 인권감수성은 30대가 60대에 비해, 고졸이상이 중졸이하보다, 시거주자가 군거주자에 비해 유의하게 높았다. 결론: 정신장애인에 대한 지역주민의 인권감수성은 매우 낮은 수준으로 이를 향상시키기 위한 중재프로그램이 요구된다.


Objectives: This study was aimed to assess the level of human rights sensitivity in total and by component and to identify the related factors to overall human rights sensitivity to the mentally disabled persons among community residents. Methods: The participants were 300 adults aged from 30s to 60s living in M city and C gun. Data were collected with self-administered questionnaire including four episodes reflecting the human rights by face to face interview during November, 2010. and analyzed with t-test and ANOVA. Results: Overall human rights sensitivity was 16.2 (based on 60), and situation perception 5.2 (based on 20), responsibility perception 5.4, responsibility perception 5.6. Among 4 human rights, the right to appropriate care was the highest as 5.7 (based on 15) and right to freedom of own body was the lowest as 2.8. The human rights sensitivity was significantly higher in aged 30s than in aged 60s, high school or higher education than middled school, and living in city than in gun. Conclusion: The human rights sensitivity to the mentally disabled among community residents was very low, and need to develop educational program promoting human rights sensitivity.


Objectives: This study was aimed to assess the level of human rights sensitivity in total and by component and to identify the related factors to overall human rights sensitivity to the mentally disabled persons among community residents. Methods: The participants were 300 adults aged from 30s to 60s living in M city and C gun. Data were collected with self-administered questionnaire including four episodes reflecting the human rights by face to face interview during November, 2010. and analyzed with t-test and ANOVA. Results: Overall human rights sensitivity was 16.2 (based on 60), and situation perception 5.2 (based on 20), responsibility perception 5.4, responsibility perception 5.6. Among 4 human rights, the right to appropriate care was the highest as 5.7 (based on 15) and right to freedom of own body was the lowest as 2.8. The human rights sensitivity was significantly higher in aged 30s than in aged 60s, high school or higher education than middled school, and living in city than in gun. Conclusion: The human rights sensitivity to the mentally disabled among community residents was very low, and need to develop educational program promoting human rights sensitivity.