초록 열기/닫기 버튼
Even though the law was patterned after the European legal system, there is no denying that the Law was influenced by that of the developed country. A Judicial precedent Standing to sue has become one of the most important and controversial issues in suits between the press and the victims injured by the press reports. The traditional theory of standing in the courts was, at the beginning of the century, whether the interest asserted by th plaintiff amounted to a ‘legal right’, entitled to the protection of the common law. The Civil procedure system equal with its system in the United States. The doctrine of standing to sue has plagued the Supreme Court for several decades. In recent years, the Supreme Court seems to have settled on a two-tiered method for determining whether a plaintiff has standing to sue in federal court. The first level of inquiry is the constitutional core, and the second is the judicially imposed prudential limitations. The purpose of this study of judicial precedents is to find out the doctrine of standing in the legal proceedings related Mass media. The press is requested to help sincerely the victim recover, realizing that they waste their reputation and credit not to mention a lot of time and money during the legal dispute. Also, the press needs to internally transform as well to prevent legal dispute, enforcing confirmation when collecting news materials and building up the device for the press reports.
키워드열기/닫기 버튼
Standing, Civil Suits, Mass media, Legal dispute, Press report, Plaintiff
