From 1910s, Danjae became to recognize the limitation of nationalism starting to admit the theory of the social reform and the world reform. He was given the effect of Anarchism as anti-authoritarianism for Josun which was not the strong but the weak. Beginning to accept Anarchism regularly, He didn‘t pursue independence by the power any more. Instead of that, he was unjust another nation's rule to our nation and aimed at coexisting with others. He advocated the peace of human races beyond its nationality. From this, without a mention of a nation, he emphasized the liberation from Japanese authoritarianism which meaned 'the people liberation.' He claimed to set up Japanese Imperialism through the means of the people immediateness revolution not for Josun’s independence as a nation but for establishing the world all of Josun people leaded liberal lives. In 1920s he regarded the racial liberation movement as the movement of people liberation and anarchist. He advocated liberation from Japan to liberate the people from Japanese coercion not to form a new government plundering the people. We can acknowledge that Korean History was obliged to keep the orientation of nationalism to criticize and come over Japan's colonial historical view. But the motto, 'the subjective national historical view' in Revitalizing Reform system made his historical view be understood in only national historical view. We have to reflect that this prevents the opportunity to totally understand his entire historical view.

From 1910s, Danjae became to recognize the limitation of nationalism starting to admit the theory of the social reform and the world reform. He was given the effect of Anarchism as anti-authoritarianism for Josun which was not the strong but the weak. Beginning to accept Anarchism regularly, He didn‘t pursue independence by the power any more. Instead of that, he was unjust another nation's rule to our nation and aimed at coexisting with others. He advocated the peace of human races beyond its nationality. From this, without a mention of a nation, he emphasized the liberation from Japanese authoritarianism which meaned 'the people liberation.' He claimed to set up Japanese Imperialism through the means of the people immediateness revolution not for Josun’s independence as a nation but for establishing the world all of Josun people leaded liberal lives. In 1920s he regarded the racial liberation movement as the movement of people liberation and anarchist. He advocated liberation from Japan to liberate the people from Japanese coercion not to form a new government plundering the people. We can acknowledge that Korean History was obliged to keep the orientation of nationalism to criticize and come over Japan's colonial historical view. But the motto, 'the subjective national historical view' in Revitalizing Reform system made his historical view be understood in only national historical view. We have to reflect that this prevents the opportunity to totally understand his entire historical view.