본 연구의 목적은 『한중록』이라 불리는 작품의 이본인 李氣銅本과 一蓑本을 국어학적으로 비교하여 李氣銅本의 간행 연대를 추정하는 것이다. 『한중록』은 『한중만록』, 『읍혈록』 등의 명칭으로 불리며 지금까지 21종의 이본을 확인할 수 있다. 그러나 현재까지 원본으로 확정된 것은 없다. 본고에서는 여기에 새로운 1종을 추가하여 李氣銅本이라고 하고 이를 一蓑本과 비교하여 李氣銅本의 간행 연대를 추정한다. 이를 위해 두 이본 사이에서 관찰되는 연철ㆍ중철ㆍ분철, 합용병서, ‘ㅎ’종성체언, 높임법의 주격 표지, 음운변화 등의 표기 경향을 살폈다. 李氣銅本의 표기는 근대국어의 일반적 표기 경향에 가까우면서도 궁중에서 만들어진 작품이라는 성격 때문에 근대국어 이전의 표기 경향도 반영하는 보수성을 보여주고 있다. 이에 비해 一蓑本은 근대국어의 표기 경향을 따르면서도 근대국어 후기의 성격도 반영하고 있다. 그러므로 두 이본의 비교를 통해 李氣銅本이 적어도 一蓑本보다 앞선 시기의 작품으로 판단할 수 있다.

The purpose of this study is to compare the Lee Ki Dong-version Hanjungrok with the IlSa-version linguistically and to estimate the age of publication. The Hanjungrok has 21 versions and various names such as Hanjungmanrok, Uephyoelrok. But, up to now, there is no version identified as the original. In this paper one version called Lee Ki Dong-version is added to the versions of Hanjungrok and then compared with IlSa-version to estimate age of publication. For that, this paper investigated the notational tendency of both versions. On the one hand the notation of the Lee Ki Dong-version resembles Modern Korean notational tendency, but on the other shows the conservativeness that reflects the notational tendency of Middle Korean because of the particularity as Court literature. In comparison, the IlSa-version reflects the notational tendency of not only Modern Korean but also Late Modern Korean. As a result, the comparison between the Lee Ki Dong-version and the IlSa-version suggests that the former is earlier at least than the latter.

The purpose of this study is to compare the Lee Ki Dong-version Hanjungrok with the IlSa-version linguistically and to estimate the age of publication. The Hanjungrok has 21 versions and various names such as Hanjungmanrok, Uephyoelrok. But, up to now, there is no version identified as the original. In this paper one version called Lee Ki Dong-version is added to the versions of Hanjungrok and then compared with IlSa-version to estimate age of publication. For that, this paper investigated the notational tendency of both versions. On the one hand the notation of the Lee Ki Dong-version resembles Modern Korean notational tendency, but on the other shows the conservativeness that reflects the notational tendency of Middle Korean because of the particularity as Court literature. In comparison, the IlSa-version reflects the notational tendency of not only Modern Korean but also Late Modern Korean. As a result, the comparison between the Lee Ki Dong-version and the IlSa-version suggests that the former is earlier at least than the latter.

, , , , , ,

Hanjungrok, notation, writing the consonant characters, 'ㅎ'final consonant noun, nominative case marker, phonological change