초록 열기/닫기 버튼
This paper studied the narration feature of Su-Tong’s novel from the viewpoint of comparing standard narration. Su-Tong fulfilled his own destruction desire and overturn desire in a novel writing, which exposed the subaltern narration, female narration and history narration. In subaltern narration, this paper proved that subaltern was not good, virtuous, honest but crooked, wicked by examining the WuLong of Rice, ChenMao of House of Poppy, delinquent boys of Area of North City, KeYuan of How Can Snake Fly. This paper not only compared them with XiangZi of LaoShe’s novel Camel XiangZi as the standard narration of subaltern but also compared them with Liu ZhenYun’s Days like Chicken Feathers regarding a gloomy future of subaltern. In female narration, this paper not only proved that woman was voluptuous, jealous, vicious, vain by examining the XiaoE of Cosmetics, JinLan of Area of North City but also proved that woman was the existence who relied on man by examining the SongLian of Wives and Concubines, Xian of Lady Life, XiaoE of Cosmetics. Proved that the female image of negative personality was originated from the resistance of Confucian tradition female image such as tenderness, beauty, goodness, maternal affection by examining Tang Dynasty novel Yingying’s Biography. Proved that the female image of reliance existence was originated from the resistance of independent female image in Socialism literature by examining the YangMo’s Song of Youth. In history narration, this paper proved that individual got out of the flow of history by examining the SongLian of Wives and Concubines, XiaoE of Cosmetics, Ms. Jiang of Escape of 1934, ChenMao and Liu ChenCao of House of Poppy, Analects of Confucius of My Emperor Life. Proved that Su-Tong’s history narration was somewhat different from other new-history novel by examining the MoYan’s Red Sorghum, which made the subject of history replace majority with minority. Proved that Su-Tong’s history narration was originated from the resistance of standard history narration in which individual not only coincided exactly with the flow of history but also realized historical value, such as LuXun’s A Madman’s Diary, Medicine and LaoShe’s Camel XiangZi. These aesthetic features of Su-Tong’s novel narration had been accomplished by resisting the standard narration. The existing standard narration was a kind of authority discourse. It could be said that Su-Tong has accomplished his own aesthetic discourse resisting the authority discourse. There were three main field in which he defied the authority discourse. The first was a subaltern narration. The second was a female narration. The third was a history narration.
