초록 열기/닫기 버튼

This study is focused on the comparison of the learning methods regarding the text-centered, responds-centered, and constructivism literature education. The comparisons of the three literature education paradigms are as follow. First, the text centered literature education which occurred in the late 1st educational course is based on the behaviorism. It leaves out the both reading activities and progress of learners which re-composes literature meaning, and only provides the answers from the authoritative critics. Therefore, it can be leads to the conventional problems such as teacher-centered, result-centered paradigms. Second, the response based literature education paradigm had succeed in paradigm shift by moving the literature reading focus from ‘text’ to ‘learner’, and ‘result’ to ‘progress’. It excludes the literature knowledge on purpose, while promoting the learners’ responses. For that reason, the learning contents become uncertain, and it can also cause the problems regarding specific learning methods. Lastly, the constructivist literature education which started since 1998, brings back the literature knowledge to the ground and insists to teach ‘genre knowledge’ that can interpret empirical knowledge besides the Ontological knowledge in the past newcriticism. In conclusion, we need to search for the right educational methods based on the comprehends of past literature paradigm shifts to generate the actual changes in our literature education.