초록 열기/닫기 버튼
[o/wa, no/ga, no/wo] all constructions had a degree higher than a pronoun of appearance of the complementizer. no/wa except for a construction, no/ga,, no/wo,, it can see a construction being used overwhelmingly as complementizer. Iit was analyzed in syntactic way. no/wa there was difference between a few frequencies, but the pronoun which receives the person, time and the location by a construction found out that it's used freely. Next, no/ga,, the person, time and the location compared by a construction, and had an occurring frequency higher than a complementizer in turn for few pronouns for the pronoun occurring frequency, but the pronoun which shows a place was low relatively. But it's a pronoun, no/ga, a construction and the semantic restrictions don't operate to show a construction the person, time and the location. It's last, no/wo,, the construction is different from two constructions above-mentioned. no/war and, no/ga", it's a complementizer that it's maine like a construction or but apparent, it's so overwhelming that there is no comparison when the occurring frequency is seen, no/wo, there were few pronouns for a construction. This, no/wo, to indicate a pronoun by a construction, anyway, it's with the place which isn't taken.
키워드열기/닫기 버튼
Pronoun, Formal noun, Principal clause predicate, complementizer
