초록 열기/닫기 버튼
본 연구는 한국의 사회복지시설평가가 3차에 걸쳐 평가방법에 대한 많은 연구와 포럼들이 진행되고 있으나 각 평가영역에서 문제점들이 도출되고 있는 것이 현실이다. 이러한 상황에서 제4차 사회복지시설평가가 진행된다면 똑같은 시행착오 속에서 시시비비는 계속 이어질 것이다. 한편 제3자 평가 사업을 개발하여 새로운 평가방법으로 인정받고 있으며, 현재까지 장애자, 보육분야, 아동분야, 노인분야, 대학분야 등에서 시작되어 사회복지 전반 분야로 확대되고 있는 일본의 제3자 평가사업에 관한 내용을 분석․검토한 후, 국제간의 비교 신뢰도를 높이기 위하여 OECD에서 실시한 평가를 한국과 일본의 평가에 접목하여 재구성한 분석틀로 한국과 일본의 평가 현황과 문제점을 비교․검토한 후 기존 한국의 사회복지시설 평가에 일조하고자 한다.
This study addresses the third-party evaluation methods for social welfare facilities in Korea. Although studies and researches of third-party evaluation methods for Korean social welfare facilities are developing, it is fact that many problems are found at various sectors as well. If such evaluation methods apply to the fourth social welfare evaluation without cautions, the question of feasibility to the methods will arise from different institutions. Japan’s third-party evalutaion method, applying to the area of nurturing, child care, elderly care and even to colleges with a great sucess to date, is studied and discussed in this study. Also for the credibility’s sake, a comparison is made between data both from OECD and Japan so that this study might make a good contribution to the development of evaluation system on Korean social welfare facilities.
This study addresses the third-party evaluation methods for social welfare facilities in Korea. Although studies and researches of third-party evaluation methods for Korean social welfare facilities are developing, it is fact that many problems are found at various sectors as well. If such evaluation methods apply to the fourth social welfare evaluation without cautions, the question of feasibility to the methods will arise from different institutions. Japan’s third-party evalutaion method, applying to the area of nurturing, child care, elderly care and even to colleges with a great sucess to date, is studied and discussed in this study. Also for the credibility’s sake, a comparison is made between data both from OECD and Japan so that this study might make a good contribution to the development of evaluation system on Korean social welfare facilities.
키워드열기/닫기 버튼
Social Welfare Facilities Evaluation, The Third person Evaluation System, OECD, PUMA, Performance Management
