초록 열기/닫기 버튼

본 논문은 외환위기 이후 근로빈곤층의 주거실태 및 주거양상의 변화, 그리고 이에 영향을 미치는 요인을 밝혀 이들의 주거안정 대책을 모색하는 데에 그 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 한국노동패널(KLIPS) 3~9차 자료를 활용하여 근로빈곤층의 주거실태를 주거이동양상, 최저주거기준 충족여부, 주거비 지불능력으로 살펴보았으며, 이들의 주거안정에 영향을 미치는 요인을 일반화추정방정식을 활용하여 분석하였다. 분석 결과 외환위기 이후 시간 경과에 따라 근로빈곤층의 주거상태가 열악해지고 있음이 확인되었다. 또한 주거안정에 영향을 미치는 요인을 살펴본 결과, 지역, 점유형태, 가구원수, 연령, 교육수준, 고용형태와 같은 변수가 통계적으로 유의미하게 나타났다. 이상의 분석 결과를 바탕으로 가구원수 및 소득수준을 반영하는 공공 임대주택 공급의 확대, 그리고 거주 지역과 연령을 고려한 임대료 보조정책의 현실화에 대해 제언하였다.


The purpose of this study is to describe the housing status and the stability of the working poor, and to explore factors influencing the housing status and the stability of the working poor. Using the 7-year accumulated data from the KLIPS(Korean Labor and Income Study), we analyzed the transition of the housing tenure type, minimum housing standards, housing affordablity. Furthermore, we analyzed factors influencing the housing stability of the working poor. The results of this study are as followed: First of all, the housing status of the working poor has been worsen in length of time. And residence, house tenure type, the number of households, age, education, characteristics of the job are shown to be significant predictors for the housing stability. Such results suggest that extension of the public rental housing system which reflected the number of the households, and housing subsidy system which reflected residence and age.


The purpose of this study is to describe the housing status and the stability of the working poor, and to explore factors influencing the housing status and the stability of the working poor. Using the 7-year accumulated data from the KLIPS(Korean Labor and Income Study), we analyzed the transition of the housing tenure type, minimum housing standards, housing affordablity. Furthermore, we analyzed factors influencing the housing stability of the working poor. The results of this study are as followed: First of all, the housing status of the working poor has been worsen in length of time. And residence, house tenure type, the number of households, age, education, characteristics of the job are shown to be significant predictors for the housing stability. Such results suggest that extension of the public rental housing system which reflected the number of the households, and housing subsidy system which reflected residence and age.