@article{ART001696891,
author={김종혁},
title={Reflexivity and Anti-locality in Tamil},
journal={언어학},
issn={1225-7141},
year={2012},
volume={20},
number={3},
pages={59-71},
doi={10.24303/lakdoi.2012.20.3.59}
}

TY - JOUR
AU - 김종혁
TI - Reflexivity and Anti-locality in Tamil
T2 - 언어학
JO - 언어학
PY - 2012
VL - 20
IS - 3
PB - 대한언어학회
SP - 59
EP - 71
SN - 1225-7141
AB - Reinhart and Reuland (1993) divide anaphors into two types—SE-anaphors and SELF anaphors—based on their ability to reflexivize the predicates that they are arguments of. Lidz (1995, 2001a) presents anaphors from Kannada, a Dravidian language, as a clear case of evidence for Reinhart and Reuland’s SE/SELF distinction. In this paper, I examine anaphors of Tamil, another Dravidian language, and show, contra Lidz, that they do not support but in fact falsify the SE/SELF distinction. The same conclusion is drawn for Kannada anaphors.
KW - Tamil, reflexivity, anaphors, locality
DO - 10.24303/lakdoi.2012.20.3.59
ER -

김종혁. 2012, "Reflexivity and Anti-locality in Tamil", 언어학, vol.20, no.3 pp.59-71. Available from: doi:10.24303/lakdoi.2012.20.3.59

김종혁 "Reflexivity and Anti-locality in Tamil" 언어학 20.3 pp.59-71 (2012) : 59.

김종혁. Reflexivity and Anti-locality in Tamil. 2012; 20(3), 59-71. Available from: doi:10.24303/lakdoi.2012.20.3.59

김종혁. "Reflexivity and Anti-locality in Tamil" 언어학 20, no.3 (2012) : 59-71.doi: 10.24303/lakdoi.2012.20.3.59

김종혁. Reflexivity and Anti-locality in Tamil. 언어학, 20(3), 59-71. doi: 10.24303/lakdoi.2012.20.3.59

김종혁. Reflexivity and Anti-locality in Tamil. 언어학. 2012; 20(3) 59-71. doi: 10.24303/lakdoi.2012.20.3.59

김종혁. Reflexivity and Anti-locality in Tamil. 2012; 20(3), 59-71. Available from: doi:10.24303/lakdoi.2012.20.3.59

김종혁. "Reflexivity and Anti-locality in Tamil" 언어학 20, no.3 (2012) : 59-71.doi: 10.24303/lakdoi.2012.20.3.59