초록 열기/닫기 버튼
This paper discusses several characteristics found in Korean insubordination. According to Evans (2007), ‘insubordination’ refers to the conventionalized main clauses use of what appears to be formally subordinate clauses. The objects of this study are the following 6 forms, ‘-deunji’ ‘-eosseumyeon’, ‘-gineun1’ ‘-gineun2’ ‘-gileul’ and ‘-neun/eul subakke’, which have not been classified as sentence-final forms. They have several grammatical phenomena in common. First, they are not always allowed to recover a main clause or main verb, in other words, very restricted main verbs can come after these constructions. This means that the range of meanings of the insubordination construction becomes quite narrow and specific, compared to when they are used as ordinary subordinate clauses. Second, their illocutionary force does not change depending on intonation, unlike what we call ‘banmal(반말)’, and the sentence types of these constructions may often be vague. Third, some of them still cannot take tense endings and they can refer to past events, without taking past tense.
키워드열기/닫기 버튼
insubordination, finite clauses, non-finite clauses, non-assertive, subordinate clauses, independent clause, main clause