초록 열기/닫기 버튼
지금까지 민속예술경연대회(한국민속예술축제)에 대한 논의에서 경연대회가 안고 있는 문제가 다양한 부면에서 노정되었다. 그러나 정작 경연대회의 대상인 민속 그 자체의 존재 및 성격 변화와 전승주체의 동향에 대해서는 본격적인 논의가 부족했다고 생각한다. 부연하자면 본디와 다른 맥락에서 전승되던 민속이 경연대회를 위해 재구성되고 문화재로 지정되어 유통되는 과정에서 일어난 성격의 변화, 그리고 그 과정에서 야기된 전승주체들의 위상 변화에 대한 논의가 쟁점화하지 않았다는 것이다. 이런 맥락에서 우선 경연대회에 참가하기 위해 텍스트를 생산하는 과정과 그 과정에 동원된 기술적 측면들을 개관한 다음, 민속의 존재 및 성격과 주체의 위상 변화 문제를 검토해 보았다. 연구결과 민속예술경연대회에 참가하기 위한 준비 단계에서 전래의 민속은, 참가작을 만드는 데 필요한 가공되지 않은 자원으로 인식되었고 민속을 가공하는 과정에서 시공간 압축 및 선택과 집중을 통한 인상적 연출이라는 필수적 기술과 콜라주, 스펙타클화와 같은 선택적 기술들이 동원되었음을 알 수 있었다. 또한 민속예술경연대회를 중심으로 한 일련의 과정을 통해 전승주체와 민속은 서로 이화됨으로써 상호 소외와 물화의 관계에 있음을 확인할 수 있었다.
Up to now, the problems about the National Folk Arts Contest are revealed from various side on the estimation. But, in my opinion, the full discussion about the issue, the change of folklore’s existence and character as a object of the contest and the trends of the subject, was not enough. Explain clearly, the folklore which had been passed down on the context which is not original was restructured for the contest, and folklore had been designed as a cultural property and It has been put into circulation. However, the discussion about the change of character in this process and change of status of the subject during that process does not became a issue. In this context, I overview a course of produce text and technical side to attend contest. Then I examine the folklore’s existence and character, and the change of status of the subject carefully. As a result of study, the traditional folklore has been recognized as aresource to make a work of art which is need to attend the contest. And essential technic that including time-space compression and impressive direction through selection and concentration, and optional technology; collage, spectaclization, were mobilized in the process for making a work of art. Through this process, the subject reificated folklore, but also the subject had been a part of folklore. Eventually, dual relationship between reification and alienation developed between the subject and folklore. In this process, folklore had been departed from life context, and the reification and alienation was not solved between the subject and folklore. Finally, the transmission of the subject was a folklore as a product. In addition, it was not the art of life and not the folklore of life which is for human through reflection and self-motion. The leftovers are folklore and the subject that was reificated and alienated by each other.
키워드열기/닫기 버튼
The National Folk Arts Contest, The Korea Folk Art Festival, The original form, Artistry, The creation of text, Reification, Alienation, The subject of tradition
