초록 열기/닫기 버튼
As the penetration of smart devices such popular OS for mobile devices basedapplications such as Internet access and applications are free to install, haschanged the composition of the market as it is possible to run. These apps tobe purchased in order to receive a variety of services in smart devices, theapp can deal app developers enrolled in the App market. But to attempt totransition from the dominance of the OS market in Appmarket. Market shareof Google’s Android is more than 70% globally and 90% in Korea’s case, thearrival time was needed to compete for a legal review of various policypackages and accounted for more than Google’s market share. To provideappropriate regulations for the IT business of such foreign country throughthe extraterritorial application of MRFTA provisions that have becomeimportant legal issues in the mobile app ecosystem. By the dominance of themobile OS market, act to deny the registration of the other apps in the appmarket competitors think the market is trading action for refusal to rule outa rival. And as a result, due to the consumer by limiting the registration ofthird-party app market competitors could disadvantage consumers by makinguse of its app market instead of a third party app market. These actions needto be appropriately regulated as other acts that interfere with the businessactivities of the operators as market dominant position abuse.
키워드열기/닫기 버튼
Appmarket, OS operator, market abuse, competition, refusal to deal, extraterritorial application, tying
