초록 열기/닫기 버튼
1950~70년대 남한의 역사학계에는 사회적 의제를 실현하기 위해 역사연구와 역사담론을 구축하면서, 잡지를 통해 지식대중과 소통하였던 역사연구자들이 있었다. 이 글은 그들의 역사연구와 그것의 사회담론화 과정을 검토한 것이다. 한국전쟁 이후 설립된 역사학회의 성원들은 1950년대 『사상계』에 필진과 편집위원 등으로 참여하여 반독재 반독점 민주주의담론의 형성에 기여했다. 이 시기 민주주의․근대화론의 기반이 되었던 역사담론은 서양사학계가 제시한 서양의 근대화모델 또는 민주주의모델이었다. 식민사관의 정체성론을 극복하고자 했던 연구자들을 중심으로 1967년에 창립된 한국사연구회는 ‘내재적 발전론’과 ‘분단시대의 역사인식론’을 역사담론으로 제시하였다. 이들은 자신의 역사담론을 『창작과비평』을 통해서 다른 분과학문의 학자들을 비롯하여 지식대중과 소통할 수 있었다. 창비와 긴밀하게 결합했던 연구자들은 다른 분과학문들의 학자군들과 소통하면서 민족경제론, 민중신학론 등 당시의 대표적인 저항/대안담론의 영역을 구축해갔다. 그러나 70년대 후반 한국사연구회의 일반적인 기조는 한국사회와 사회과학계에서 새롭게 제안되던 민중론이나 현대사 연구를 역사연구 속으로 충분히 수렴해내지 못하였다. 이는 1980년대 새로이 역사관련 학회가 설립되는 배경이 되었다.
In the historical academia in South Korea from the 1950s to the 1970s, there were historians who communicated with an informed public through journals to fulfill social agendas by carrying out historical research and historical discourse. This paper reviews their historical research and the process of social discourse that resulted from their research. The members of the Korean Historical Association, which was established in the aftermath of the Korean War, participated as writers and editorial members of the Sasangge in the 1950s and contributed to the formation of a discourse for democratization that was anti- dictatorial and anti-monopolistic. At this time, the historical discourse, which served as the foundation for theories of democracy and modernization, was the West’s modernization model or democratization model as suggested by western historical scholarship. The Association for Korean Historical Studies, which was established in 1967 by researchers who sought to overcome the challenges of identity posed by the colonial framework, offered the “Theory of Intrinsic Development” and “Historical Consciousness in an Age of National Division” for historical discourse. Through The Quarterly Changbi, these scholars were able to communicate their historical discourses with scholars in other disciplines, as well as the informed public. Through such cooperative efforts, researchers who worked closely with The Quarterly Changbi created a forum for resistance and counter-proposals that represented the era, including the theory of national economy and the Minjung Theology. However, the general direction and structure of the Association for Korean Historical Studies in the late 1970s could not sufficiently absorb the Minjung theory or contemporary history research which sprang up in Korean society and the discipline of the social sciences. This served as the background for the birth of a new historical association in the 1980s.
키워드열기/닫기 버튼
Historical Academia, Social Discourse, Historical Society, The Korean Historical Association, Association for Korean Historical Studies, Sasangge, The Quarterly Changbi
