1. 고구려 건국신화는 약간씩 다르기는 하지만 「광개토왕비문」, 『삼국사기』, 『삼국유사』, 그리고 「동명왕편」에 나온다. 우리는 『삼국사기』고구려 주몽왕 편에서 해모수, 그리고 해부루를 만난다. 『삼국유사』에 따르면, 해모수는 오룡거를 타고 홀승골성에 도착해북부여를 건국한 천왕이었다. 『삼국유사』에 따르면, 해부루는 해모수의 아들이고, 처음에 북부여의 왕이다가 상제의 명으로 가섭원으로이주해서 동부여의 왕이 되었다. 『삼국사기』에 따르면, 북부여의 구도에는 자칭 해모수왕이 왔다. 『삼국사기』에 따르면, 주몽은 해모수와우발수의 유화 사이에서 태어났다. 이제까지 『삼국사기』에서 해모수는 한 명으로 간주되었다. 나는 『삼국사기』와 『삼국유사』를 비교한후에 고구려사 속에 적어도 세 명의 다른 해모수가 있다는 것을 발견했다. 이제까지 『삼국사기』 고구려사에서 동명은 한 명으로 간주되었다. 나는 『후한서』 및 『삼국지』의 부여조와 『삼국유사』를 비교한 후에 고구려사에서 동명이 적어도 두 명이라는 것을 발견했다. 나는 『삼국사기』와 『삼국유사』를 비교한 후에 북부여 구도의 해모수를 졸본부여의 동명이라는 것을 확인했다. 이제까지 『삼국사기』 고구려사에서 해부루는 한 명으로 간주되었다. 나는 『삼국사기』와 『삼국유사』를비교해서 적어도 세 명의 해부루를 발견하였다. 나는 북부여와 동부여의 왕 해부루가 한 개인 왕명이 아니라 왕호라는 것을 알았다. 나는그 후 해모수, 동명, 그리고 해부루가 단지 개인 왕 이름일 뿐 아니라또한 왕호라고 결론 내렸다. 나는 고구려 주몽왕이 고유명이자 신왕호로서 주몽을 가지고 있고 구왕호로서 동명을 가지고 있으며, 졸본부여 동명왕이 고유명이자 신왕호로서 동명을 가지고 있고 구왕호로서 해모수를 가지고 있다는 것을 알았다. 이것이 신구 왕호 토픽의 병행 호칭법이다. 이것이 한국고유철학의 주제 중의 하나이다. 2. 한국사의 자료 해석방식에는 축소해석과 확장해석이 있다. 사서가 「광토개왕비문」, 『삼국사기』, 『삼국유사』, 그리고 「동명왕편」으로시간이 갈수록 북부여, 동부여, 졸본부여, 그리고 고구려의 역사가 축소된다. 『후한서』와 『삼국지』의 부여조와 『삼국유사』를 비교해 보면,동명왕은 두 번 건국했다. 『삼국사기』와 「광개토왕비문」을 비교해보면, 고구려 주몽은 세 번 건국했다. 주몽의 건국이 「광개토왕비문」의 첫 번째 건국에서 『삼국사기』의 세 번째로 변하자, 졸본부여의 동명왕의 이 단계 건국 전승과 북부여 해모수왕의 건국 전승이 축소해석 되고, 때때로 신구 왕호 토픽 병행 호칭법 때문에 주몽 건국 속에사라져 버렸다. 이것이 왕 계보 의식과 역사의 축소해석이다. 한국인이 한자와 한국전통철학, 그리고 중국사를 연구한 것은 축복이었다. 그러나, 한국 전통철학과 중국사를 연구하면 할수록 한국사는 확대해석되는 것이 아니라 축소해석되어 왔다. 이것들은 부작용이다. 3. 그러나 한국인 학자들과 과학자들이 한국현대철학을 연구했지만,『환단고기』를 제외하고는 아무도 「광개토왕비문」, 『삼국사기』, 『삼국유사』 그리고 「동명왕편」의 북부여, 동부여, 졸본부여 그리고 고구려의 전승에서 세 명의 해모수, 두 명의 동명, 그리고 세 명의 해부루를발견하지 못했다. 『환단고기』는 북부여기에서 북부여와 졸본부여를다루고, 가섭원부여기에 동부여를 다루고, 그리고 고구려본기에서 고구려를 다루고 있다. 한국사는 환인－환웅대인국사－고조선사－북부여사－졸본부여사－고구려사의 계보의식을 가지고 있다. 우리는 현재국가 대표자의 호칭으로 대통령을 사용한다. 우리는 발해와 신라에서고조선까지 국가의 최고 지도자를 왕호 왕으로 불렀다. 그러나 나는그 이전 시대에서도 신라사의 왕호변천과정에서도 신구 왕호 토픽 병행법을 확인한다. 즉, “거서간”－“차차웅”－“이사금”－“마립간”은 『삼국유사』와 『삼국사기』 사이에 왕호 신구 토픽법이 작동한다. 실제 동명, 해모수, 부루는 한 명이 아니라 여러 명이었다. 아마 단군, 대인환웅, 환인도 여러 명이었을 것이다. 『환단고기』에 의하면, 환인에서 고구려까지 신왕국의 건설자들은 신구 왕호를 병행해서 사용했다. 예컨대, 신구 왕호법은 다음과 같다: 고구려의 추모와 동명; 졸본부여의 동명과 해모수; 옥저의 불리지와 해모수; 원 고구려 진국의 진왕과 해모수; 북부여의 해모수와 단군; 고조선은 후반에 부루과 단군; 초반에 단군과 왕검, 단군왕검과 대인환웅; 예조선은 기수, 기자와 단군; 대인환웅국의 대인환웅과 천왕[환인], 그리고 환국의 천왕환인이다. 이제까지는 『환단고기』를 제외하고 누구도 왕호의 신구 토픽 병행호칭법을 파악한 적이 없다. 우리는 4권으로 구성된 『환단고기』에서신구왕호법을 발견한다. 2권으로 이루어진 『삼성기』에는 환인이라불리는 7왕이 있고, 환웅과 천왕으로 불린 18왕이 있다. 『단군세기』에는 신인 단군왕검이라 불린 첫번째 단군을 포함해 단군이라 불린47명의 왕이 나오고 또 (색)부루, 기수, 기자라 불린 일부 왕이 나온다. 『북부여기』에는 동명, 해모수, 단군, 그리고 천왕이라 불린 6명의왕이 나온다. 『태백일사』에는 환국본기의 “환인” 7왕, 배달국의 “환웅”, “천왕” 18왕 그리고 삼한관경본기 막조선의 35왕, 번조선의 74왕과 진조선의 47 단군, 천왕 그리고 고구려본기의 불리지, 주몽, 천왕, 왕, 태왕, 어하라, 그리고 발해본기의 황제라 불린 14왕이 나온다. 그리고 소도경전본훈에 천부경이 나온다. 『환단고기』에 따르면, 북부여 해모수왕은 북부여를 한 번은 북부여 신수도에서, 한 번은 대부야구수도에서 두 번 건국했다. 남한, 북한, 그리고 일본의 대부분의 역사학자는 보통 『환단고기』를 최근에 창작된 것으로 생각한다. 만일『산해경』의 진실이 가능하다면, 『환단고기』의 진실도 가능하다. 이것이 『환단고기』위서론을 의심하는 이유 중의 하나이다.

1. The founding myths of Goguryeo are related in ancient Korean texts, with slight variations, including the Gwanggaetostele, the SamgukSagi, the SamgukYusa, and the DongmyeongWangpyeon of the DonggukIsanggukjip (by YiGyu－bo). We Koreans have faced “Haemosu” and “Haeburu” in the King “Chumong” story of “Goguryeo” in SamgukSagi. According to SamgukYusa, Haemosu is the king of heaven, riding in achariot of five dragons, arriving at Holsenggolseong to establish Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo). According to another story of SamgukYusa, “Haeburu” {who is the prince of the Heaven King “Haemosu” of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo)}is the first King of DongBuyeo (East Buyeo). According to SamgukSagi,Haeburu, by order of the King of Heaven, after moving to the new capital of Gasepwon, became the new founder King of Dongbuyeo (East 284 仙道文化 제 10 권Buyeo), and then the name of 3 other Kings “Haemosu” came from the old capital of BukBuyeo (North Buyeo). According to SamgukSagi,Chumong is described as the son of “Haemosu” (the prince of heaven)and Yuhwa (daughter of the river god Habaek) of Ubalsu. Until now, we believed that there was only one Haemosu in “Goguryeo” foundation history of SamgukSagi. After comparing SamgukSagi with SamgukYusa, I find that there are really three king Haemosus i.e. the first king “Haemosu” of North Buyeo, the second king “Haemosu” of the former Capital city of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo), and the third king “Haemosu”of Ubalsu, Samguk Goguryeo people always considered there was only one person with the same name. Until now, we also believed that there was only one Dongmyeong in Goguryeo foundation history in SamgukYusa. I now differenciate Dongmyeong of Jolbon Buyeo from Dongmyeong of Goguryeo, after comparing SamgukYusa with Buyeo in History of the Later Han (simplified Chinese: 后汉书; traditional Chinese: 後汉书; pinyin:hòuhànshū; Wade－Giles: Hou Han Shu) & Records of Three Kingdoms (simplified Chinese: 三國志; traditional Chinese: 三國志; pinyin: SānguóZhì). After comparing SamgukSagi with SamgukYusa, I identified Haemosu of the former Capital city of North Buyeo as Dongmyeong of Jolbon Buyeo. Until now, we believed that there was only one Haeburu in “Goguryeo” history of SamgukSagi. Now I recognize at least three Haeburus among one Haeburu of East Buyeo, another Haeburu of the same as King Youngpumli of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo), the third Haeburu of one King both of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo) and ancestor of King Biru of Baekje in both SamgukSagi and SamgukYusa. I realized that King “Haeburu” of BukBuyeo (North Buyeo)and DongBuyeo (East Buyeo) was not one personal King name but was 285계보위축변천과정, 왕호 신구 토픽 그리고 『환단고기』 신 진위검토방법(2)ㆍ박병섭the new title name of King. Then I concluded that Haemosu,Dongmyeong and Haeburu is not only the personal King name but also the title name of King. It can be seen that king “Chumong” of Goguryeo was called one personal name and the title name of the King Chumong and another old title name of king Dongmyeong, and king “Dongmyeong” of Jolbon Buyeo have been called one personal name and same new title name of king Dongmyeong and another old title name of king Haemosu. These are subjects of Korean Original Philosophy and history of ancient Korea. 2. Comparing records of Gwanggaetostele, SamgukSagi, SamgukYusa, and DongmyeongWangpyeon of DonggukIsanggukjip (by YiGyu－bo), delay time foundation histories of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo), DongBuyeo (East Buyeo), Jolbon Buyeo, and Goguryeo reproduced on a reduced scale. From comparing articles “Buyeo” in History of the Later Han (simplified Chinese: 后汉书; traditional Chinese: 後漢書; pinyin: hòuhànshū; Wade－Giles: Hou Han Shu) and Records of Three Kingdoms (simplified Chinese: 三國志; traditional Chinese: 三國志; pinyin: Sānguó Zhì ) with SamgukYusa, it can be seen that King Dongmyeng founded Jolbon Buyeo in two steps:first step in Jolbon and second in the former capital city of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo). From comparing articles “Goguryeo” in SamgukSagi with The stele of King Gwanggaeto, one can see that king Chumong founded Goguryeo in three steps: i.e. the first founder as successor of Jolbon Buyeo after crossing Buyeo’s Great Omni River (in 58 B.C.) from the Gwanggaetostele; the second founder of arriving at Modungog in 40B.C. from the Goja stele; the third founder of arriving at Jolbon River as the western of former Capital 286 仙道文化 제 10 권city of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo) in 37 B.C, from Samguk Sagi in contemporary stories, but by changing sites and years of the first founding king of state from the first step founder as successor of Jolbon Buyeo after crossing Buyeo’s Great Omni River [in 58 B.C.] from the Gwanggae to stele to the third step founder of arriving at Jolbon River closed western to former Capital city of Bukbuyeo (NorthBuyeo) in 37 B.C. from the SamgukSagi of king Chumong, two step storie soft he first founding King Dongmyeng of JolbonBuyeo and two step stories of the first founding King Haemosu of Bukbuyeo (NorthBuyeo) happened to deflation interpretation and some times was reduced to just King Chumong story of Goguryeo because of topics both called new title names and old title names of the King. This is the deflation interpretation of dynasty’s lineages and Korean history of consciousness. Korean studying literary Chinese known as Hanmun in Korean,Kanbun in Japanese and as Hán Văn in Vietnamese (in all three cases,“Han writing”), Chinese Ancient Philosophy and it’s history are blessings for understanding Korean history. After many years of studying Traditional Philosophy and Chinese history, record data of Korean history becomes a deflation interpretation. This deflation interpretation has harmful side effects. 3. Although modern philosopher and historian studies of ancient Korean texts with slight variations, including Gwanggaetostele, Samguk Sagi,SamgukYusa, and Dongmyeong Wangpyeon of the DonggukIsanggukjip, no one can find three Haemosus, two Dongmyeongs, three Haeburus among histories of Bukbuyeo (NorthBuyeo), DongBuyeo (EastBuyeo),JolbonBuyeo, or Goguryeo except one book, Hwandangogi. 287계보위축변천과정, 왕호 신구 토픽 그리고 『환단고기』 신 진위검토방법(2)ㆍ박병섭Only Hwandangogi distinguishes exactly four dynasties including (4－1)Bukbuyeogi, describing the six kings of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo) the four kings of Buk buyeo (NorthBuyeo); (4-2) Gasepwonbuyeogi, describing the three kings of Dong Buyeo (EastBuyeo), (5) the two kings of Jolbon Buyeo; and (6) Goguryeobongi, describing the impotent kings including king Chumong. Korean ancient history follows successors of (1) Hwanin-(2)Hwanwung Giant-(3) Gojocheon-(4) BukBuyeo (North Buyeo)-(5) Jolbon Buyeo-(6) Goguryeo-(7) Balhae and Great Silla-(8) Goryeo-(9)Jocheon-(10) North and South Korea. We have called the title name of first governor of government “president” in (10) North and South Korea. We have called title names of the “king” for the Kings of states from (7) Balhae and Great Silla to (9) Jocheon. However, Silla times before calling the title name of king “wang” of Great Silla, I interpret that Silla follow the topic both called new title name and old title names of the king such as [“Geoseogan)”-“Chachaung”]-“Isageum”-“Maegeum”-“Maripgan”-“Wang”-“Taewang”-“D aewang” during changing time from old title name to new title name of the same king in Silla, according to difference of the title name of the king between SamgukSagi and SamgukYusa. In fact, there is not just one personal King named “Dongmyeng”, one personal King named “Haemosu” and one personal King named “Buru”,but many Kings called the same title name of king “Dongmyeng”, many Kings called the same title name of king “Haemosu” and many Kings called the same title name of king “Buru” from Goguryeo to North Buyeo in Korea history. I assume that there was not just one personal name for King 288 仙道文化 제 10 권“Dangun”, for King “Giant-Hwanwung” and for King “Hwanin” (the “king of Heaven”) but that many Kings were called the same title name of Kings “Dangun”, many Kings called the same title name of Kings “Giant-Hwanwung” and many Kings called the same title name of Kings. From my analysis of Hwandangogi, I realized that there are topics both called new title names and old title names of the kings not as assumptions but as histories from (1) Hwanin to (6) Goguyeo. For example, there are topics both called new title names and old title names of the kings such as: the topic both called “Chumong” and Dongmyeong of (6) Goguryeo;the topic both called “Dongmyeng” and Haemosu of (5) Jolbon Buyeo;the topic both called “Buliji” and Haemosu of Okjeo(4-1); the topic both called “Jin” and Haemosu of Jin state (Pro Goguryeo); the topic both called “Haemosu” (person god) and Dangun (4) North Buyeo; the topic both called “Gisu” or “Gija” and Dangun of (3-3) Ye-Joseon; the topic both called “Buru” and Dangun of (3-2) Three (Go]jocheon); the topic both called “Dangun Wanggeom” (person god) and Giant-Hwanung of (3-1) Three Han (Go]jocheon); the topic both called “Dangun” and Wanggeom of (3) Go]joseon; the topic both called “Wanggeom”(persongod) and Giant-Hwanwung of Giant-Hwanwung states (2-1); the topic both called “Giant-Hwanwung” and the King of Heaven (Hwanin)of (2) Giant-Hwanwung state; the topic both called “Hwanin” or “the King of Heaven” of (1) Hwanin state. Until now, no one recognized that the topic was both called by new title names and old title names of the kings except the author of one book i.e. the author of Hwandangogi. We find the topic both called the new title names and the old title names of the kings in Hwandangogi comprised of the four books: (1)SamseongGi (two volumes), describing the 7kings called the title name of 289계보위축변천과정, 왕호 신구 토픽 그리고 『환단고기』신 진위검토방법(2)ㆍ박병섭the king “Hwannin” (“Hwannin” means the King of Heaven or in origin Korean terms The God) and the 18 kings called the title name of the king “Hwanwung”, or “Chenwang” (that means the King of Heaven); (2)DangunSegi, chronicled the history of Gojoseon with 47 generations both of Dangun rulers called the same title name of the king, “Dangun”included first Dangun called “personal god DangunWanggeom” and some rulers called other title names of the king, “(Saek)Buru”, “Gisu”, “Gija”(3) BukbuyeoGi, describing the six kings of Bukbuyeo (NorthBuyeo) called the same title name of the king, the topic both called “Dongmyeng”,“Haemosu”, “Dangun” and “Chenwang”, and the topic both called “Haemosu”, “Dangun” and “Chenwang”, and the topic both called “Buliji” or “Jin”, and “personal god-Haemosu”, and the king of called “king Chumong”; (4) TaebaekIlsa, describing the histories of Hwan-guk included 7 kings called the title name of the king “Hwanin” (i.e. king of Heaven)”, Baedalguk included 18 kings called the title name of the king “Giant-Hwanwung”, and another title name of small king “personal god-Wanggeom”; Samjoseon included 35 kings called the title name of the king, “king” of MakJoseon (or MaekJoseon), 74 or 75kings called the title name of the king “king” of BunJoseon (or YeJoseon) and 47 kings “Dangun”, “Chenwang” (that means the King of Heaven) inclusive of new Joseon founder called both personal name and the title name of the king “(Saek)Buru” of Jin-Joseon, Goguryeo including some kings called title name of the king, “Buliji”, “Jin”, “Wang” (that means common title name of kings in Korea), “Taewang” (title name of the king that means the Great King among kings), “A-hara”, Balhae included 14 kings called title name of the king “Hwangje” (that means the common title name of Great kings in Chinese style) and Goryeo; Goryeo remained with only three title 290 仙道文化 제 10 권names of kings: Wang, Hwangje and Eimgumlim. TaebaekIlsa also includes the text of Cheonbu-gyeong, and just one other subject. According to Hwandangogi, King Haemosu founded Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo) in two steps, including both of the first in the new Capital city of Bukbuyeo (North Buyeo), as he did with the former Capital city of Daebuyeo (Great Buyeo) which were called both the personal name and new title name of king “Haemosu”, and second in last Capital city (“Jangdanggyeong”) of Daebuyeo (Great Buyeo) which were called the old title name of the king “Dangun”, “Chenwangrang (‘Chenwang’ that means the king of Heaven, ‘Rang’ that means the young man)”. Most historians in South Korea, North Korea and Japan generally consider, for the following three reasons, the HwandanGogi has been written in recent times: (1) There are words from modern language. (for example: ‘the equality of man and woman’ and ‘paternal rights’) (2) The route through which HwandanGogi was first published is not clear. (3) The contents in HwandanGogi are not realistic (for example: the population 180million of Gojoseon 4,000 years ago and ‘several thousand kilometers of the nation’ in about 8000BCE). At least the first reason is proof because ‘the equality of man and woman’ of modern ideas and ‘paternal rights’ of the axial ideas, but are right issues of the four group societies (Girl group,Boy group, Mother group, Father group) in Hwannin’s state. This four group societies (Girl group, Boy group, Mother group, Father group)appeared two times both first case in “(Girl group), (Boy group), (Mother group)”, this line appears to be Sima’s opinion after Benji of the Five Emperors of The Records of the Grand Historian, and second case “today current customs is: called Mother group, called Father group, called Boy group, called Girl group, but we don’t know the origin of that story today 291계보위축변천과정, 왕호 신구 토픽 그리고 『환단고기』 신 진위검토방법(2)ㆍ박병섭of the SamgukYusa. I agree that the second reason is proof but am not certain of the details. As for the third reason my opinion is simple. Please don’t forget SanHaeGyeong (simplified Chinese: 山海經; traditional Chinese: 山海經; pinyin: Shānhǎi Jīng; Wade-Giles: Shan Hai Ching; literally “Collection(Classic) of the Mountains and Seas”). If authenticity of SanHaeGyeong is possible, then authenticity of HwandanGogi is also possible. These reasons lead me to revaluate HwandanGogi.

Giant-Hwanwung, Gojoseon, Bukbuyeo, Jolbonbuyeo and Goguryeo