초록 열기/닫기 버튼
M. M. Bakhtin wrote 'contemporary vitalism' in the name of I. I. Kanaev to participate in the debate about vitalism and machanism in 1920's. The aim of this study is to trace the biological discourse imbued in Bakhtin's thought. M. M. Bakhtin unites all the flows of contemporary thoughts, which designates 'the dialogizing background' of Makhlin. Up to now, the attempt was made to interpret the thought of Bakhtin under the religio-philosophical or purely philosophical view. I think that this is an human scientific approach to Bakhtin's thoughts. This study is an attempt to approach the thoughts of M. M. Bakhtin under natural sciences. I think that M. M. Bakhtin is a thinker to unite human and natural sciences on behalf of human sciences. But it is not possible to disregard the influences of natural science, especially vitalism or organism. The force, or entelechia issued by Hans Driesch is equivalent to value as a principle to construct the whole artwork topologically as the force distributes matter among space and organize the organism topologically.
키워드열기/닫기 버튼
vitalism entelechia dialog the other mechanism expressive aesthetics
