본 연구는 W. Jantzen이 제안한 “재역사화” 개념을 중심으로 기존의 장애(인) 존재 부정적 진단방법론에 대한 비판적 성찰을 통하여 존재긍정적 장애진단방법론을 개발하고자 하였다. 연구결과 진단자와 피진단자의 병리적 관계 회복 및 인간 뇌의 보편적 능력의 성실한 발현을 위해서는 피진단자의 삶을 재역사화 하여 그를 ‘이해하는 진단학’이 필요함을 알 수 있었다. 주체인식론적 접근을 통한 이러한 새로운 진단작업은 또한 이를 통해 피진단자 뿐 아니라 진단자(전문가)의 삶도 긍정되는 결과를 성취할 수 있으므로 매우 중요하다. 즉 장애를 ‘당신’의 이야기에서 ‘우리’의 이야기로 전환하는 데 결정적인 역할을 할 수 있는 것이 이러한 재역사화 하는 진단학임을 알 수 있었다.

This study aims to critically consider the diagnosis method which denies the existence of disability or disabled people focusing on the concept of re-historisation, which W. Jantzen has suggested, and then develop a method for disability diagnosis which accepts its existence. For doing this, the researcher has set up the category of possibility and the consequence of resilience as the key subjects of this study for critically considering the relationship between diagnostician and the customer as well as their diagnosis process. As a result, it has been learned that a re-historisation of customer's life and the diagnostics in which the re-historisation can be fully understood are necessary for restoring pathological relationship between diagnostician and the customer as well as for revealing general ability of human being's brain. This new method of diagnostics which permits subject-recognising approach is important for reason that through the method the customer's as well as diagnostician's life can be positively accepted. So it is suffice to say that it is the new method of re-historising disagnostics that plays a key role in converting 'your stories' to 'our stories'.

This study aims to critically consider the diagnosis method which denies the existence of disability or disabled people focusing on the concept of re-historisation, which W. Jantzen has suggested, and then develop a method for disability diagnosis which accepts its existence. For doing this, the researcher has set up the category of possibility and the consequence of resilience as the key subjects of this study for critically considering the relationship between diagnostician and the customer as well as their diagnosis process. As a result, it has been learned that a re-historisation of customer's life and the diagnostics in which the re-historisation can be fully understood are necessary for restoring pathological relationship between diagnostician and the customer as well as for revealing general ability of human being's brain. This new method of diagnostics which permits subject-recognising approach is important for reason that through the method the customer's as well as diagnostician's life can be positively accepted. So it is suffice to say that it is the new method of re-historising disagnostics that plays a key role in converting 'your stories' to 'our stories'.

re-historisation, the method for disability diagnosis which positively accepts an existence, plasticity of brain, the relationship between diagnostician and the customer