이 글은 대명률직해에서 공간적 체언과 통합하는 처격 조사 ‘良中’ 및 ‘中’과 구격 조사 ‘以’의 쓰임에 관하여 분석한 것이다. ‘良中’은 ‘-에’와 ‘-에서’의 형태적 변별성 없이 사용되었음을 보이고, ‘中’이 대명률직해에서도 처격 조사로서 사용되었음을 구문 분석을 통해 확인하였다. 그리고 ‘以’가 ‘-로’ 외에 ‘-에서’로서도 쓰였음을 주시하여 이의 용법상 차이를 살폈다. 또한 ‘-에서’로서 쓰인 ‘以’와 본래 처격 조사인 ‘良中’과의 용법상 차이도 알아 보았다.

This paper analyze purposes about both the postposition of locative ‘良中(e/eseo)’ and ‘中(e/eseo)’ and the postposition of instrumental ‘以(ro/eseo)’ in the Dae-myeong-ryul-jik-hae. It let see the ‘良中(e/eseo)’ is used that is not diveided into two morphome ‘e’ and ‘eseo’. Also it ascertain the ‘中(e/ eseo)’ to be used in the Dae-myeong-ryul-jik-hae through the analysis of sentence structure. And it consider a different usage about ‘以(ro/eseo)’ that is used ‘eseo’ except ‘ro’. Also it find out a different usage about ‘以(ro/eseo)’ that is used ‘eseo’ and original postposition of locative ‘良中’(e/eseo).

This paper analyze purposes about both the postposition of locative ‘良中(e/eseo)’ and ‘中(e/eseo)’ and the postposition of instrumental ‘以(ro/eseo)’ in the Dae-myeong-ryul-jik-hae. It let see the ‘良中(e/eseo)’ is used that is not diveided into two morphome ‘e’ and ‘eseo’. Also it ascertain the ‘中(e/ eseo)’ to be used in the Dae-myeong-ryul-jik-hae through the analysis of sentence structure. And it consider a different usage about ‘以(ro/eseo)’ that is used ‘eseo’ except ‘ro’. Also it find out a different usage about ‘以(ro/eseo)’ that is used ‘eseo’ and original postposition of locative ‘良中’(e/eseo).

Dae-myeong-ryul-jik-hae, postposition of locative,postposition of instrumental, 良中(e/eseo), 中(e/eseo),以(ro/eseo).