본 논문의 목적은 외교의례라는 키워드를 통해서 조선시대 한일관계사의 일면을 파악해 보려는 것이었다. 근세 조ㆍ일 외교의 장에서도 의례문제는 중요시되었고, 때로는 외교분쟁으로 번지기도 하였다. 통신사외교는 양국 간의 善隣友好를 상징하는 것이었지만 내면적으로는 대립과 갈등이 적지 않았다. 조선시대 외교의례를 둘러싼 교섭과 전개과정은 한일외교사의 가장 치열한 현장이라 할 수 있다. 한국과 일본의 관계사에 있어서 외교의례를 둘러싼 갈등과 마찰은 고대부터 근대까지 계속 있어왔다. 그 원인의 하나로 계서적인 성격을 띤 동아시아국제사회의 체제 속에서 양국 모두 외교적 우위를 다투는 현상을 들 수 있다. 국가의식의 대립과 상호인식상의 현저한 차이는 외교현장에서 의례를 둘러싼 갈등으로 표출되었다. 조선시대의 통신사외교에서도 예외가 아니다. 그것이 현저히 드러난 사례가 1636년 병자통신사행과 1711년 신묘통신사행시의 외교의례 개변이었다. 본 연구에서는 조선시대의 통신사에 대한 일본의 접대와 국서전달의례의 변화양상을 고찰해 보았다. 또 비교를 위해 일본국왕사를 비롯한 일본사절에 대한 조선의 접대와 외교의례에 관해서도 살펴보았다. 외교의례 문제는 상호인식과 대외정책이 충돌하는 현장으로서 조선시대 한일관계의 실상을 엿볼 수 있는 흥미로운 주제이다. 본래의 목적은 외교의례가 변화되는 과정의 분석을 통해 양국의 상호인식과 외교정책과의 관련성을 밝혀 보고자 하는 것이었다. 그 점에서 본고는 미흡하며 시론적인 수준에 머물렀지만, 앞으로의 연구과제로 삼고자 한다.

The purpose of this paper is to consider the relation history between Korea and Japan through the diplomatic protocol as keyword. Problem of protocol has been important affairs on the diplomacy between Korea and Japan in the early modern age. Sometimes it generated diplomatic dispute. Though diplomacy via Tongsinsa(Korean delegates to Japan in the Joseon Dynasty) symbolizes good-neighbor relation of two nations, but inside there was not a little conflict and discord. So negotiation and development process over diplomatic protocol in the Joseon Dynasty were the fiercest site of diplomatic history between Korea and Japan. Discord and friction over diplomatic protocol have been from ancient to modern age on the relation history between Korea and Japan. One of the causes is phenomenon of content for diplomatic superiority in the international society of East Asia of premodern age. The conflict of national consciousness and remarkable gap of mutual perception revealed discord over protocol in diplomatic stage. Diplomacy via Tongsinsa in the Joseon Dynasty is not exception. Changes on diplomatic protocol in delegates of 1636 and 1711 were the most representative cases. In this paper I considered Japanese reception for Tongsinsa and changeable aspects on protocol of delivery of national literature. Furthermore, I considered the reception and protocol of Joseon Dynasty in comparative perspective. The Problem of diplomatic protocol is very interesting topic that is conflicting site of mutual perception and diplomatic policy. Original purpose of this paper is to trace correlation between mutual perception and diplomatic policy through analysis on changing process of diplomatic protocol. In that respect, this paper feels not quite satisfied and is still preliminary stages, I will make for next subject of study.

The purpose of this paper is to consider the relation history between Korea and Japan through the diplomatic protocol as keyword. Problem of protocol has been important affairs on the diplomacy between Korea and Japan in the early modern age. Sometimes it generated diplomatic dispute. Though diplomacy via Tongsinsa(Korean delegates to Japan in the Joseon Dynasty) symbolizes good-neighbor relation of two nations, but inside there was not a little conflict and discord. So negotiation and development process over diplomatic protocol in the Joseon Dynasty were the fiercest site of diplomatic history between Korea and Japan. Discord and friction over diplomatic protocol have been from ancient to modern age on the relation history between Korea and Japan. One of the causes is phenomenon of content for diplomatic superiority in the international society of East Asia of premodern age. The conflict of national consciousness and remarkable gap of mutual perception revealed discord over protocol in diplomatic stage. Diplomacy via Tongsinsa in the Joseon Dynasty is not exception. Changes on diplomatic protocol in delegates of 1636 and 1711 were the most representative cases. In this paper I considered Japanese reception for Tongsinsa and changeable aspects on protocol of delivery of national literature. Furthermore, I considered the reception and protocol of Joseon Dynasty in comparative perspective. The Problem of diplomatic protocol is very interesting topic that is conflicting site of mutual perception and diplomatic policy. Original purpose of this paper is to trace correlation between mutual perception and diplomatic policy through analysis on changing process of diplomatic protocol. In that respect, this paper feels not quite satisfied and is still preliminary stages, I will make for next subject of study.

Tongsinsa(Korean delegates to Japan in the Joseon Dynasty), Delegates of Japanese King, diplomatic protocol, mutual perception, protocol of delivery of national literature